What Is Hope, and Why Does It Function as a Trap?
Ruiz opens with the myth of Pandora's box, a deliberate reframing of the classical narrative. When Pandora opens the forbidden box, demons escape—judgment, anger, jealousy—but the last and most subtle demon to escape is hope itself. This choice is intentional. For Ruiz, hope is not a virtue to be celebrated but a tool of control and postponement (31s: "Hope was the last demon to escape").
The mechanism is simple and insidious: "We follow hope all the time, it's like carrot that you use to bring a donkey wherever you want it to go" (61s). Hope dangles a carrot of future fulfillment, keeping attention perpetually ahead of the present moment. The donkey walks toward the carrot and never reaches it; the walker never stops moving. In this framing, hope is not an emotion but a technology—one that keeps the nervous system activated toward an unreachable goal, while the present moment, where action actually occurs, is systematically overlooked.
This is not mere metaphor. Ruiz notes that he "want[ed] to stop follow hope" for a long time (70s), recognizing it as an obstacle to his own peace and effectiveness. The shift away from hope is not passive; it requires substitution with something more powerful.
How Does Faith Differ from Hope, and What Makes It a Tool?
Ruiz is careful here: "I'm not talking about religion. It's a fact" (86s). He defines faith as neutral capacity—"believing something without a doubt" (256s)—but the target of that faith determines everything. Faith itself is amoral. It is power without direction, a faculty that amplifies whatever it is invested in.
In childhood, Ruiz absorbed the opinions, teachings, and mythologies of his culture: "I heard the opinions of everybody, the teachings from everybody, and I believe them and I put my faith in every concept that I learn and I follow those concepts, those rules without knowing that that was not truth" (103s-124s). He had faith, certainly, but faith in inherited lies. The faith was real; the object was false.
This misplaced faith created an entire architecture of belief, and then, crucially, a psychology of defense. Ruiz became "very fanatic defending all those concepts, defending all those beliefs. I was real fanatic that I could even kill or die defending an idea, defending a belief" (149s-162s). Fanaticism is not a quirk of personality; it is the natural outcome of investing faith in inherited mythology without questioning it. The more invested the faith, the more rigid the defense.
The result: "My faith was trapped with all those beliefs, I have faith believing in all those lies who control completely the story of my life" (177s-193s). Faith becomes a cage rather than a tool. And within that cage, the practitioner clings to hope—the promise that someday the goal (imaginary, never questioned) will be reached. "I have always that faith that perhaps one day I will reach a goal, a goal that was only real in my imagination, in my mind" (193s-208s).
What Is the Savior Within, and How Does It Change the Use of Faith?
Ruiz identifies a pattern: cultures teach that salvation comes from outside—from God, guru, doctor, social movement, lottery. "We put our faith in the wrong place, we didn't know that there is a savior, someone who will save us but that savior is right here is inside of us that savior is life itself" (267s-284s).
This is not New Age optimism. It is a structural observation: you do not need to be saved from the outside because the capacity to create and to act already exists within you, as life itself. The savior is not a being; it is awareness and the body's capacity to move in accordance with clarity.
When this awareness lands—when you recognize that the source of power is interior, not exterior—faith is reclaimed and repointed. "Now we can focus the faith in ourself when I have faith in myself I don't play with hope but I take the action I always do my best, because I have faith in me" (302s-321s).
This is the pivot. Faith in oneself is not arrogance; it is the withdrawal of projection. Instead of hoping that the universe will deliver, instead of waiting for the savior, the practitioner acts. And because the faith is anchored in self-knowledge rather than fantasy, external opinions cannot shake it: "Whatever opinion that come from the outside, will not affect me because I don't take that personally, because I have faith in ourself, faith in life itself, inside and outside of us" (333s-348s).
What Does Unlearning Mean in the Toltec Practice?
Ruiz's son is quoted: "In this artist training, Toltec, we don't learn we unlearn and we unlearn all those lies that follow hope" (362s-367s). This is a critical distinction. The teaching is not about acquiring new beliefs to replace old ones. It is about removing false beliefs so that what remains is clarity—the capacity to perceive what is actually here and to act from that perception.
Unlearning reverses the childhood process. Instead of absorbing mythologies and investing faith in them, the practitioner examines the mythologies already received (from religion, society, science), recognizes them as constructs rather than facts, and withdraws emotional and cognitive investment from them. As the false belief system loosens, faith becomes available again—now available to be invested in what you actually perceive and create, not in what you were taught to expect.
"When we do that, our creation becomes impeccable. Now we are impeccable with the word, we are impeccable with intent, we're impeccable with ourselves" (376s-401s). Impeccability means alignment between intention, speech, and action. It arises not from moral effort but from the clarity that comes when faith is no longer subdivided into a thousand competing beliefs.
How Does Action Replace Hope in Daily Practice?
Ruiz's practical instruction is direct: "If you want to, if you understand, you may start taking the first steps to push away faith and replace it with your action, because you will see the results and you will not expect that someone will give you what you hope" (414s-435s).
Note the phrasing: "push away faith and replace it with your action." This is not a call to abandon faith but to stop using it as a substitute for action. Action is not hope's opposite; it is hope's antidote. When you act—when you do what is in front of you with full presence and commitment—you see results. You see what actually works. The results become your teacher, not your fantasies.
This breaks the cycle. Hope promises future fulfillment and postpones satisfaction; action delivers present feedback and trains the nervous system toward effectiveness. Over time, the practitioner learns to trust the process because they can see it working, not because they believe it will work.
How Does Ruiz Model the Paradox of Hope in His Own Speech?
At the close, Ruiz demonstrates the subtlety of the teaching with apparent contradiction: "It's been a big pleasure to be with all of you and I hope that you have, do you see, I say 'I hope' that you have a wonderful day the best day of your life" (435s-451s).
He uses the word hope. Then he catches himself, points to the use, and clarifies: "but it's up to you to have faith in yourself, I only hope that you can do it, like I hope that you help me to change the world, your world. You see I still use the word hope but I don't apply it in me" (462s-481s).
This is not performative humility. Ruiz is demonstrating that hope is a cultural convention, a linguistic habit. You can use the word without being captured by its mechanism. You can hope (as a polite utterance or a general aspiration) while anchoring your actual power in faith in yourself and action in the present. The two are compatible; the danger lies only in treating hope as your primary engine.
Where to Go from Here
If this teaching resonates, the next steps are not intellectual but practical. Begin to notice where you are putting your faith. Are you invested in inherited beliefs you have never questioned? Are you hoping for external salvation while postponing action? Can you identify areas where faith in yourself (your perception, your capacity, your understanding) would enable more direct action? The teaching is not a new belief to adopt but an invitation to examine the beliefs already running and to reclaim the faculty of faith for your own authentic creation.
]]>
